"Daniel Stenberg" <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> You have convinced me. I agree that your suggested timeout setting makes
> sense, and perhaps we should even consider to lower the default timeout
> somewhat.

OK! I'll spend some time this afternoon grabbing the latest CVS and
developing a clean patch against that.

I'm not sure there's a compelling reason to lower the default at this time -
simply providing a means to manually lower the timeout should be enough,
shouldn't it?

--
-- Early Ehlinger CEO, ResPower Inc - Toll-Free : 866-737-7697
-- www.respower.com -- 500+ GHz Supercomputer Starting At USD$0.50/GHz*Hour
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf