curlpp mailing list Archives

[cURLpp] setOpt using a pointer to an option - do we really need it?

From: Piotr Dobrogost <curlpp_at_2008.autoera.pl>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:09:00 +0100

Jean

What is the reason for allowing to set an option using a pointer?
I think that having a version with reference is enough. The version with pointer is not needed and brings problems with memory management into the library.

Regards
Piotr Dobrogost
_______________________________________________
cURLpp mailing list
cURLpp_at_rrette.com
http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp
Received on 2008-11-14

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre: "Re: [cURLpp] setOpt using a pointer to an option - do we really need it?"
Previous message: Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre: "Re: [cURLpp] A little fix for cURLpp"
Next in thread: Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre: "Re: [cURLpp] setOpt using a pointer to an option - do we really need it?"
Reply: Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre: "Re: [cURLpp] setOpt using a pointer to an option - do we really need it?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

These mail archives are generated by hypermail.

Page updated November 12, 2010.
web site info

File upload with ASP.NET