On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 10:39:43AM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:

[snip]

>
> Hm, I'll get a package over to a linux machine soon and try this myself.

my system is:
  Linux burp 2.2.16 #6 Sun Jul 2 14:37:51 CEST 2000 i486 unknown
  debian potato 2.2 (frozen)
  autoconf 2.13
  automake 1.4
  curl 7.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl 7.1

i made ./configure --without-ssl. here at home everything seems to work
correctly.

>
> > PS: should we package libcurl and curl seperately? hardly seems worth
> > it, but....[shrug]. I'm already making a new -devel package with that
> > stuff.
>
yes, it seems it doesn't worth it, i know, but i'm still packaging libcurl,
libcurl-dev and curl separately. apt does the hard work to find and download
everything for only 0.005 bogomips more.

> It has been mentioned before, and I have given it some thoughts. I really
> can't see any major benefits in doing that. The package really is 95% libcurl
> code, curl is nothing without libcurl and the majority of all the people that
> get the package wants curl and aren't even aware of libcurl...
>
> Or does anyone else have any other opinion?
>
if i could decide if curl is ssl or no-ssl only by installing the ssl or
no-ssl libcurl...

as far as curl is concerned, does it know something about ssl or delegates
everything to lib curl? (yeah, i already asked this question, but i think
the answer was ot.) :)

bye

-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
  --[ get my public pgp key at http://www.freeweb.org/free/cavok/
-[ unix is user friendly. it's just selective about who its friends are...