runtests: parse data/Makefile.inc instead of using make #7177
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The warning about missing entries in that file then doesn't require that the Makefile has been regenerated which was confusing. The scan for the test num is a little more error prone than before (since now it doesn't actually verify that it is legitimate Makefile syntax), but I think it is good enough. Closes #7177
bagder
force-pushed
the
bagder/runtests-inc-warning
branch
from
8a880c5
to
3c0f462
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The warning about missing entries in that file then doesn't require that
the Makefile has been regenerated which was confusing.
The scan for the test num is a little more error prone than before
(since now it doesn't actually verify that it is legitimate Makefile
syntax), but I think it is good enough.