Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move authneg bit #12949

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

move authneg bit #12949

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

icing
Copy link
Contributor

@icing icing commented Feb 16, 2024

  • from conn->bits.authneg to data->req.authneg
  • AFAICT, this is a property of the request about to be made and not a property of the connection
  • in multiuse connections, transfer could step on each others toes here potentially.

- from `conn->bits.authneg` to `data->req.authneg`
- AFAICT, this is a property of the request about to be made
  and not a property of the connection
- in multiuse connections, transfer could step on each others
  toes here potentially.
@icing icing marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 11:17
@jay
Copy link
Member

jay commented Feb 16, 2024

hm. I feel like there was probably a good reason authneg was put on the connection level... maybe because of authentications that are connection level and not request level like NTLM and that is why?

@icing
Copy link
Contributor Author

icing commented Feb 17, 2024

AFAICT, it was only used to make the special tweaks for an empty PUT/POST when auth negotiation was still ongoing.

@jay
Copy link
Member

jay commented Feb 18, 2024

@iboukris

Copy link
Member

@bagder bagder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this is a correct change.

@bagder bagder closed this in 2254551 Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants