Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

nss: remove support for this TLS library #11459

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

nss: remove support for this TLS library #11459

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bagder
Copy link
Member

@bagder bagder commented Jul 18, 2023 •
edited

The motivation was previously in DEPRECATED and included:

  • There are few users left who use curl+NSS
  • NSS has few users outside of curl as well (primarily Firefox)
  • NSS is harder than ever to find documentation for
  • NSS was always "best" used with Red Hat Linux when they provided additional
    features on top of the regular NSS that is not shipped by the vanilla library

@bagder bagder added TLS feature-window A merge of this requires an open feature window labels Jul 18, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added cmdline tool tests CI Continuous Integration labels Jul 18, 2023
@bagder bagder closed this in 7c8bae0 Jul 29, 2023
@bagder bagder deleted the bagder/rm-nss branch July 29, 2023 21:45
@papjul papjul mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2023
Closed
@MichalPetryka MichalPetryka mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2023
Closed
ptitSeb pushed a commit to wasix-org/curl that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
@bagder @ptitSeb
nss: remove support for this TLS library
3367fba 
Closes curl#11459
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
CI Continuous Integration cmdline tool feature-window A merge of this requires an open feature window tests TLS
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
1 participant
@bagder