transfer: limit Windows SO_SNDBUF updates to once a second #10611
+13
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Change readwrite_upload() to call win_update_buffer_size() no more than once a second to update SO_SNDBUF (send buffer limit). Prior to this change during an upload readwrite_upload() could call win_update_buffer_size() anywhere from hundreds of times per second to an extreme test case of 100k per second (which is likely due to a bug, and that will be reported separately). In the latter case WPA profiler showed win_update_buffer_size was the highest capture count in readwrite_upload. In any case the calls were excessive and unnecessary. Closes #xxxx
|
Could we move this into the cf-socket.c and keep the update time in its context? I think this would be a better place where the actual network writes happen. |
bagder
reviewed
Feb 27, 2023
| #if defined(WIN32) && defined(USE_WINSOCK) | ||
| struct curltime last_sndbuf_update; /* last time readwrite_upload called | ||
| win_update_buffer_size */ | ||
| #endif |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Try putting entries in (roughly) size order in the struct to allow better packing optimization. Ie you could add this new struct above the two unsigned char entries.
It was in readwrite_upload so it's only used on sockets that are being used by libcurl to send (large) request uploads |
bch
pushed a commit
to bch/curl
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2023
- Change readwrite_upload() to call win_update_buffer_size() no more than once a second to update SO_SNDBUF (send buffer limit). Prior to this change during an upload readwrite_upload() could call win_update_buffer_size() anywhere from hundreds of times per second to an extreme test case of 100k per second (which is likely due to a bug, see curl#10618). In the latter case WPA profiler showed win_update_buffer_size was the highest capture count in readwrite_upload. In any case the calls were excessive and unnecessary. Ref: curl#2762 Closes curl#10611
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to this change during an upload readwrite_upload() could call win_update_buffer_size() anywhere from hundreds of times per second to an extreme test case of 100k per second (which is likely due to a bug, and that will be reported separately). In the latter case WPA profiler showed win_update_buffer_size was the highest capture count in readwrite_upload. In any case the calls were excessive and unnecessary.
Closes #xxxx