urlapi: do the port number extraction without using sscanf() #10541
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- sscanf() is rather complex and slow, strchr() much simpler - the port number function does not need to fully verify the IPv6 address anyway as it is done later in the hostname_check() function and doing it twice is unnecessary.
The port extractor code validates the IPV6 address much less now
bch
pushed a commit
to bch/curl
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2023
- sscanf() is rather complex and slow, strchr() much simpler - the port number function does not need to fully verify the IPv6 address anyway as it is done later in the hostname_check() function and doing it twice is unnecessary. Closes curl#10541
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
sscanf() is rather complex and slow, strchr() much simpler
the port number function does not need to fully verify the IPv6 address anyway as it is done later in the hostname_check() function and doing it twice is unnecessary.